1. Use IST session dates
Convert each stored timestamp to Asia/Kolkata before grouping. The archive uses UTC timestamps that correspond to the following calendar date in IST.
Milan Day / Archival research
Milan Day Historical Analysis
What does the Milan Day archive actually document? Explore a year-by-year assessment of recorded dates, usable sessions, historical Jodi distributions, and gaps in the underlying dataset—not another chart or a projection of upcoming results.
Source snapshot: 26 Oct 2026 · Archived period: 04 Jan 2021 – 24 Oct 2026 (IST). Connecting to API...
2,067Distinct dated entries in the snapshot
1,803Analysis-eligible recorded sessions
262Entries with non-numeric placeholders
2021–2026Years represented in the archive
Scope & purpose
What This Milan Day Analysis Covers
This report measures what is present in FixResult's archived Milan Day data. It answers how many dates are stored, which years have usable results, how past two-digit Jodi values are distributed, and where the source needs qualification.
The Milan Day result page serves today's update intent; the Milan Day chart serves exact-date and weekly lookup. Here, each measurement is derived from the archive as a group of past observations. Individual daily results are not duplicated in another large chart.
Reading rule: “Stored entries” includes unavailable-value placeholders. “Analysis-eligible sessions” includes only one record per IST date with three-digit Open and Close panels, a two-digit Jodi, and an internally consistent pair. These two totals should not be confused.
Evidence from the supplied snapshot
Four Findings That Matter
01
A larger stored archive is not the same as a complete-results archive
There are 2,069 source rows but 2,067 distinct IST dates. After removing 2 repeated rows, 262 non-numeric entries and 2 pair-consistency exceptions, 1,803 dates qualify for numeric comparisons.
02
Historical Sunday representation changes sharply
44 eligible Sunday records occur in 2021 and 5 in 2022; none appear from 2023 through 2026. This describes the stored archive, not independently verified operating hours or an official timetable change.
03
All 100 two-digit Jodi values appear somewhere in the qualifying archive
100 distinct combinations between 00 and 99 are present across 1,803 eligible sessions. This is a descriptive property of this sample; it does not imply even distribution or future likelihood.
04
The archive has specific, auditable quality exceptions
The date 22 May 2026 is repeated three times with identical values; 2 numerical records have Jodi values that differ from the pair recalculated from their Open and Close panels. Both issues are isolated from the statistics below.
Year-wise historical comparison
Milan Day Record Coverage by Year
The table distinguishes dated source rows from records that can safely enter numeric analysis. The share column means eligible entries ÷ entries stored for that year, not the percentage of all market sessions ever conducted.
| Year | Stored dates | Placeholders | Flagged numeric | Eligible results | Eligible share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 362 | 17 | 0 | 345 | 95.3% |
| 2022 | 365 | 60 | 0 | 305 | 83.6% |
| 2023 | 365 | 65 | 0 | 300 | 82.2% |
| 2024 | 366 | 64 | 0 | 302 | 82.5% |
| 2025 | 359 | 56 | 1 | 302 | 84.1% |
| 2026 (partial year) | 250 | 0 | 1 | 249 | 99.6% |
| Total | 2,067 | 262 | 2 | 1,803 | — |
Important: 2026 ends at 24 Oct 2026 in this snapshot. Earlier years may contain placeholder rows for dates with no supplied result. A higher eligible share does not prove a market became more regular or that its source data is more authoritative.
Why the yearly comparison is useful
Historical completeness affects every downstream statistic. When one year has more unresolved dates, comparing raw counts alone can mislead readers. Reporting each year's usable sample makes any distribution comparison more transparent. You can inspect a specific date in the Milan Day historical chart.
Interactive descriptive analysis
Historical Jodi Distribution by Period
The chart groups the first digit of each recorded two-digit Jodi into ten buckets (00–09 through 90–99). Select a year to change the sample. The original all-years summary is available in the HTML without JavaScript.
Descriptive only
1,803Eligible sessions in selection
100Distinct Jodi pairs recorded
191Same-digit pairs (00, 11 … 99)
| Jodi group | Records | Share of selected sample |
|---|---|---|
| 00–09 | 166 | 9.2% |
| 10–19 | 204 | 11.3% |
| 20–29 | 193 | 10.7% |
| 30–39 | 173 | 9.6% |
| 40–49 | 197 | 10.9% |
| 50–59 | 180 | 10.0% |
| 60–69 | 150 | 8.3% |
| 70–79 | 180 | 10.0% |
| 80–89 | 188 | 10.4% |
| 90–99 | 172 | 9.5% |
Denominator: 1,803 archive entries in the default all-year view. When a year is selected, its own eligible count is the denominator. A bucket's historical size does not measure the likelihood of future outcomes.
What the distribution can and cannot establish
Observed frequencies depend on the years included, how many records are available, and the quality rules applied. A difference between two buckets describes this archive only. It is not evidence of a repeatable mechanism or a basis for forecasting a result.
Temporal context
Record Availability and Calendar Changes
Sunday entries are historical, not evidence of today's schedule
Among the eligible records, the archive contains 44 Sunday entries in 2021 and 5 in 2022. The years 2023–2026 contain no eligible Sunday entries. This may reflect changes in market operation, source collection, or how unavailable dates were stored; this dataset alone cannot distinguish those explanations.
For current session information, use the separate Milan Day market result and timing page. For the historical dated rows, consult the archive rather than assuming every Sunday was a completed session.
2026 archived sessions by month
The bars below count analysis-eligible dates in the 2026 portion of the supplied snapshot; they do not represent business volume or market performance.
2026 ends on 24 Oct 2026 in the current source snapshot, so its final listed month is incomplete. Charts are regenerated from the embedded historical dataset, not from guessed values.
Source audit & limitations
Record Quality: What Was Excluded?
These checks are published so the numbers are reproducible and users can distinguish missing data from zero-valued results. An entry such as 00 is a legitimate two-digit representation; ** is not a number.
262Non-numeric dated entries
2Extra duplicate source rows
2Numeric consistency exceptions
Two entries requiring source review
In these stored records, the two Jodi digits differ from the last digits of the respective Open and Close panel-digit sums. This is a consistency flag, not a correction; the source result is retained in the archive and excluded from the analysis until reviewed.
| IST date | Open panel | Stored Jodi | Close panel | Recalculated pair |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Nov 2025 | 390 | 19 | 119 | 21 |
| 25 Apr 2026 | 360 | 97 | 556 | 96 |
Provenance limit: This review validates internal formatting and consistency against the embedded FixResult chart dataset. It does not independently authenticate every historical outcome against an external original declaration. Do not describe these entries as independently verified or assert that all stored rows are completed results.
Why duplicate rows are removed
The supplied source repeats the same 22 May 2026 session three times, with identical values. Counting it three times would overstate the record's frequency, so it contributes only one dated observation.
A placeholder is not automatically a mistake. It could represent a closed session, an unavailable entry, or an uncollected result. Because the source does not distinguish these explanations consistently, this page does not claim a historical market cancellation or replace a placeholder with a calculated number.
Interactive Archive Explorer
Inspect Real Milan Day Records
Search and browse verified daily declarations directly from the real FixResult Milan Day dataset.
| IST Session Date | Open Panel | Jodi | Close Panel | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading Milan Day records... | ||||
Showing records...
Reproducible approach
Milan Day Historical Analysis Methodology
Every numerical claim above is calculated from the dated records in the Milan Day Matka Chart snapshot published 26 Oct 2026. Here is how observations enter the analysis.
2. Deduplicate
Count a date only once. Identical duplicate values are removed; conflicting duplicates, if present, are held out for manual review.
3. Validate fields
Require exactly 3 numeric Open digits, 2 numeric Jodi digits and 3 numeric Close digits. Preserve leading zeros.
4. Flag inconsistencies
Compare each Jodi digit with the final digit of its panel's digit sum. Exclude mismatching entries from numerical aggregates pending review.
5. Calculate by cohort
Count only eligible records within each year or selected period. Jodi groups use the first digit; same-digit counts compare its two characters.
6. Label the snapshot
Show the underlying archive's published date and last recorded IST date. Regenerate this page after real source updates, never just to simulate freshness.
The analysis is descriptive. No statistical test here establishes independence, fairness, a causal mechanism, or predictive power. Yearly samples are unequal and the latest year is incomplete.
Interpreting the research
Milan Day Historical Analysis Questions
How does this analysis differ from the Milan Day Matka Chart?
The chart helps locate an individual result by date or week. This page groups the same underlying records into year-level coverage, quality exceptions and descriptive distributions, with inclusion criteria for each calculation.
Why are some archive dates excluded?
They may contain placeholder symbols instead of recorded numbers, duplicate a date already counted, or contain a numerical inconsistency that needs manual review. Exclusion prevents those rows from distorting comparisons; it does not erase them from the source archive.
Does an absent Sunday prove the market was closed?
No. This dataset alone cannot distinguish closures from missing source publication or changes in record collection. It can show which Sundays have usable stored results, not prove what happened on all other dates.
Can historical Jodi frequency determine a future result?
No. The frequency counts describe entries in the supplied historical snapshot. They do not establish a reliable forecasting method or make any pair more likely in the next session.
Why might the chart contain newer entries than this analysis?
The chart and current result page can be updated separately. This analysis is intentionally tied to its clearly labelled historical source snapshot; it should be recalculated when its input data changes.
Choose the right resource
Related Milan Day Resources
Research compiled from FixResult's archived Milan Day records. Informational and educational reference only; this page does not provide betting advice, accept wagers or recommend future outcomes. To report a source discrepancy, contact FixResult.